Among the 7 water quality monitoring
sections in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, the water quality in
five sections were at Level II and in the other two, it was at Level
III.
Yellow River
Basin The river basin faces the pressures of water
resource shortage and pollution. In 1999, the drying-up period of
the Yellow River added up to 42 days, with 95 days less than the previous
year. Among the 114 water quality monitoring sections, the sections
with the water quality from I to III Levels, account for 18.4%, and
the sections with water quality of Level V and worse than Level V
account for 63.1%. The major pollution indicators are permanganate
index, BOD, ammonia nitrogen, petroleum and so on. The main branches
of the Yellow River - Fen River, Wei River, Yiluo River, Xiaoqing
River are seriously polluted.
Pearl River
Basin The water quality is good on the whole. Among
the 42 water quality monitoring sections, the sections with III and
IV Levels water quality in the main stream account for 50.0% separately.
In the Xi River, 87.0% of the sections are at Level II. The water
quality in each section in the Bei River ranges from II to III Level.
In Dong River, the water quality in 90.0% of the sections is at Level
II and the main stream through Guangzhou is comparatively seriously
polluted. The major pollution indicators are permanganate index and
ammonia nitrogen.
Songhua
River Basin The river is at medium level pollution.
Among the 17 water quality monitoring sections, the sections with
II to III Level water quality account for 17.6% and the IV Level accounts
for 70.6%. The main indicators are permanganate index and ammonia
nitrogen.
Huai River
Basin In the main stream, the water quality is mainly
at Level III. The water quality in the branches is mainly Level IV
and worse than Level V. At the trans-provincial borders of the river,
the water quality is mainly Level V and worse than Level V. In 1999,
there was little rain precipitation and the water quality is a little
bit worse than that in the previous year.
Among the 79 water quality monitoring
sections of the Huai River Basin, the sections with Level V water
quality and worse than Level V account for 56.2%. The sections with
Level IV water quality account for 43.8%. The main pollution indicators
are non-ionic ammonia (ammonia nitrogen) and permanganate index.
Hai River
Basin The river is seriously polluted. Among the 171
water quality monitoring sections, the sections with Level I to III
water quality account for 41.5%, Level IV accounts for 8.8% and the
sections of Level V and worse than Level V account for 49.7%. The
main pollution indicators are permanganate index and non-ionic ammonia.
Liao River
The river is seriously polluted. Among the 52 water quality monitoring
sections, the ones worse than V level accounts for 69.3% (Among the
15 sections in the main stream, the ones Level V account for 86.7%).
The pollution in Hun River through Shenyang, Da Liao River through
Tieling and Taizi River through Anshan is especially polluted. The
main pollution indicators are COD, permanganate index, petroleum and
ammonia and nitrogen.
Rivers in
Zhejiang and Fujian Provinces The water quality in
the rivers in Zhejiang and Fujian Provinces is good on the whole.
The river courses with Level III ambient surface water quality standards
or better than that account for 71.0%, among which Level I water quality
accounts for 6.0%, Level II accounts for 24.0% and Level III accounts
for 41.0%. In 29.0% of the river courses with pollution, Level IV
water quality is 16.0%, Level V water quality is 9.0% and water quality
worse than Level V accounts for 4.0%. The main pollution indicator
is ammonia nitrogen. Jinhua River and Qu River are comparatively seriously
polluted.
Inland Rivers
The inland rivers are less polluted. The water quality in 93.0% of
the river courses being assessed reaches or is better than Level III
ambient surface water quality standard, among which, the river courses
with Level I water quality account for 17.0%, Level II water quality
accounts for 42.0% and Level III water quality is 34.0%. In 7% of
the polluted rivers, the river courses with Level IV water quality
account for 5.0% and Level V water quality account for 2.0%. The main
pollution indicators are ammonia nitrogen and volatile phenol.
Urban
River Courses The river courses going through urban
areas are normally polluted. In the 141 state-controlled urban river
courses, the water quality in 36.2% of the urban river courses is
at Level I to III and 63.8% of the water quality in the urban river
courses is at Level IV to worse than Level V. In the typical water
areas in the 47 key environmental protection cities (municipalities
directly governed by the Central Government, provincial capitals,
special economic zones, coastal open cities and key tourist cities),
19.2% of the water quality is Level II, 14.9% is Level III, 25.5%
is Level IV, 10.6% is Level V and 29.8% is worse than V Level. Due
to the large amount of the surface run-off, the surface water in the
cities in East-China and along the Yangtze River and the Yellow River
is very good. The surface water quality in the cities along Hai River
and Liao River is rather bad.
The typical water areas in the cities
are mainly polluted by ammonia nitrogen and organic pollution. The
major pollution indicators are ammonia nitrogen, permanganate index
and COD.
The sequence of the most serious pollution
to the least pollution of the seven river systems is: Liao River,
Hai River, Huai River, Yellow River, Songhua River, Pearl River and
the Yangtze. Compared with the previous year, the water quality of
Level V and worse than Level V in Hai River reduces by 10%; the organic
pollution becomes more serious due to the little run-off in Huai River;
the water quality in the Yellow River has been improved a little;
the water quality in the Pearl River decreased a little bit and the
water quality in the Yangtze, Songhua River and Liao River does not
change too much.
Large-Sized
Fresh Water Lakes
Tai Lake
Basin The whole Lake is at medium eutrophication. Among
the 101 water quality monitoring sites, the sections of Level water
quality and worse than Level V account for 65.4% and the sections
with Level II to IV water quality only account for 34.6%. The major
pollution indicators are total phosphorus, total nitrogen and permanganate
index.
Dianchi
Lake Basin Eutrophication is still rather serious.
All the 13 water quality monitoring sites are worse than Level V.
The nitrogen and phosphorus pollution is rather serious. As to the
indicators of permanganate index and COD, the water quality reaches
Level IV and V respectively.
Chao Lake
Basin After the industrial pollution sources met the
discharge standards in 1999, the eutrophication state index decreases
to certain extent. However, it is still in eutrophication state. Among
the 11 water quality monitoring sites in the lake, seven of them are
at Level V and worse than Level V. The main pollution indicators are
total phosphorus and total nitrogen.
Other Large-sized
Fresh Water Lakes The water quality in Erhai Lake is
fairly good. The water quality in Bositeng Lake, Jingpo Lake, Songhua
Lake and Xingkai Lake is good. The water quality in Dongting Lake
and Hongze Lake is rather bad and the pollution in Baiyangdian Lake
is rather serious.
Large-Sized
Reservoir
Among the nine reservoirs of Miyun in
Beijing, Dahuofang in Liaonin, Yuqiao in Tianjin, Danjiangkou in Hubei,
Dongpu in Hefei, Laoshan in Qingdao, Menlou in Yantai, Shimen in Hanzhong
and Xinanjiang in Hangzhou, the water quality in Yuqiao, Dongpu and
Laoshan Reservoirs are at Level III and the water quality in the other
six ones are at Level II. The water quality in the large-sized reservoirs
are good on the whole. Xinanjiang, Danjiangkou and Miyun Reservoirs
are in the oligotrophication state and the other six reservoirs are
at the mesotrophication state.
The sequence of the comparative pollution
extent from the most seriously polluted one to the least polluted
one of the nine large-sized reservoirs is: Dongpu, Yuqiao, Laoshan,
Shimen, Menlou, Dahuofang, Miyun, Xinanjiang and Danjiangkou. Compared
with the previous year, the water quality in the large-sized reservoirs
does not change too much.
Ground
Water
The distribution of ground water resources
in China is not well balanced in China. In the south, there are rich
water resources while in the north, it is short of water resources.
In some places, too much ground water has been explored and the water
level has kept on decreasing which has resulted in environmental geological
problems such as the earth subsidence, cracks and sea water invasion
as well as lone of depression in ground water level. In 1999, due
to little rain precipitation, the urban ground water level in Beijing,
Shandong, Henan, Inner Mongolia, Anhui, Guangdong and Guangxi Provinces
(municipalities and autonomous regions) mainly dropped. The ground
water level in Jilin Province, Shanghai, Zhejiang Province and Sichuan
Province mainly raised. There were both increase and drop as to the
ground water level in Shaangxi, Gansu, Jaingsu and Tibet. The ground
water in most of the cities was polluted by point and non-point sources.
Part of the indicators in some places surpassed the standards. The
major pollution indicators are mineralization degree, total hardness,
nitrate, nitrite, ammonia nitrogen, iron and manganese, chloride,
sulfate and pH value. The ground water pollution is becoming worse
year by year.
Discharge
Amount of Waste Water and Main Pollutants
In 1999, the total discharge amount
of the industrial and urban sewage in the whole country was 40.1 billion
tons, with 600 million tons over the previous year. The industrial
waste water amount was 19.7 billion tons, with 400 million tons less
than the previous year. The domestic sewage discharge amount was 20.4
billion tons, with 1 billion tons over the previous years. It is the
first time the domestic sewage discharge amount surpassed the industrial
waste water discharge. The total discharge amount of COD in the waste
water was 13.89 million tons, among which COD in the industrial waste
water was 6.92 million tons and COD in domestic sewage was 6.97 million
tons.
|
Comparison
of Waste Water and COD Discharge in 1999 and 1998
|
|
Item
|
Waste Water Discharge
(100 million T)
|
COD Discharge
(10 thousand T)
|
|
Year
|
Domestic
|
Industrial
|
Amount
|
Domestic
|
Industrial
|
Amount
|
|
1999
|
203.8
|
197.3
|
401.1
|
697.2
|
691.7
|
1388.9
|
|
1998
|
194.8
|
200.5
|
395.3
|
695.0
|
801.0
|
1496.0
|
|
Increase &Decrease(%)
|
4.6
|
-1.6
|
1.5
|
0.3
|
-13.6
|
-7.2
|
In 1999, the rate of the industrial
waste water treatment (including industrial and key township and village
enterprise pollution sources at county level and over county level)
was 87.2%, remaining the same as in the previous year. The attainment
rate of industrial waste water discharge was 66.7%, with 1.4% higher
than that in the previous year. The industrial waste water treatment
rate and attainment discharge rate was 91.1% and 72.1% at county level
and over county level respectively, with 2.9% and 5.1% over the previous
year.